♥ Sun, Dec 8 2013 - 06.1 KISS FM Jingle Ball: Selena Gomez, Flo Rida & Fall Out Boy Tickets in Everett, Washington For Sale

Selena Gomez TICKETS
Comcast Arena At Everett
Everett, WA
Sun, Dec 8 xxxx
View 06.1 KISS FM Jingle Ball: Selena Gomez, Flo Rida & Fall Out Boy Tickets at Comcast Arena At Everett
Call Online Ticket window Toll Free (855) 730-xxxx
Bruno Mars Bryan Adams Casting Crowns, Steve Curtis Chapman & Natalie Grant Celtic Thunder Celtic Woman Cher Charlie Wilson Chicago - The Band Chicago - The Musical Chris Botti Chris Cornell Cirque Dreams: Holidaze Cirque Du Soleil - Varekai Darius Rucker Dark Star OrchestraDave Koz David Garrett Demi Lovato Diana Krall Disney's Beauty And The Beast Disney Junior Live: Pirate & Princess Adventure Disney Live! Three Classic Fairy Tales Disney On Ice: Let's Celebrate! Disney On Ice: 100 Years Of Magic Disney On Ice: Princesses And Heroes Disney On Ice: Rockin' Ever After Disney On Ice: Passport To Adventure Dixie Chicks Donny and Marie - Christmas Tour Drake & Miguel Eddie Izzard Elf Elton John Evita Flashdance Florida Georgia Line 50 Shades! The Musical A Christmas Carol A Christmas Story Advance Auto Parts Monster Jam Adventure Club Alejandro Fernandez Alton Brown Live American Idiot Amos Lee Andrea Bocelli Arcade Fire Arctic Monkeys Austin Mahone B.B. King Barry Manilow Beyonce Bill Cosby Billy Joel Black Crowes Black Sabbath Blue Man Group Bonnie Raitt Brad Paisley Brian Regan Brian Setzer Orchestra Freestyle Motocross: Nuclear Cowboyz Gabriel Iglesias Garth Brooks Gavin Degraw George Lopez George Strait Ghost - The Musical Hedley Hillsong United How The Grinch Stole Christmas Hunter Hayes & Ashley Monroe I Love Lucy - Live Onstage il Divo: A Musical Affair Imagine Dragons Irving Berlin's White Christmas J. Cole Jaheim & Chrisette Michele Jake Miller Jason Aldean Jay-Z Jeff Dunham Jerry Seinfeld Jersey Boys Jim Brickman Jim Gaffigan Jimmy Buffett Joe Bonamassa Joel Osteen John Legend John Mayer John Pinette John Prine Johnny Reid Journey & Steve Miller Band Justin Moore Justin Timberlake - The 20/20 Experience World Tour Kanye West & Kendrick Lamar Kathy Griffin Keith Urban Kenny Rogers Kings of Leon & Gary Clark Jr. Kip Moore Korn & Rob Zombie Lady Antebellum Larry The Cable Guy Lewis Black Luke Bryan Macklemore & Ryan Lewis Mamma Mia! Mannheim Steamroller Marc Anthon Martina McBride Max and Ruby - The Nutcracker Suite Merle Haggard MGMT Michael Buble Miley Cyrus -- Bangerz Tour Million Dollar Quarte Monster Energy AMA Supercross Moody Blues Moscow Ballet's Great Russian Nutcracker MythBusters: Behind the Myths Nine Inch Nail Nitro Circus Live Once Panic! At The Disco Paramore, Metric & HelloGoodbye Paul Simon & Sting PBR - Professional Bull Rider Pearl Jam Pentatonix Peter And The Starcatcher Phantom of the Opera Pink Porgy and Bess Pretty Lights PBR - Professional Bull Riders Radio City Christmas Spectacular Rain - A Tribute to The Beattles REO Speedwagon Ringling Brothers And Barnum & Bailey Circus Robert Earl Keen Robin Thicke & Jessie J Rod Stewart & Steve Winwood Ron White Selena Gomez Sesame Street Live: Can't Stop Singing Sesame Street Live: Make A New Friend Sesame Street Live: Elmo Makes Music Shen Yun Performing Arts Sister Act Skillet & Third Day Slayer & Gojira So You Think You Can Dance? - Live Tour Sting & Paul Simon Straight No Chaser Stuart McLean Styx The Addams Family The Avett Brothers The Band Perry The Book Of Mormon The Eagles The Fresh Beat Band The Harlem Globetrotters The Lion King The Nutcracker The Oak Ridge Boys The Piano Guys The Story Tour: Casting Crowns, Steve Curtis Chapman & Natalie Grant The Wizard Of Oz Theresa Caputo Third Eye Blind TobyMac Tony Bennett Trace Adkins Trans-Siberian Orchestra: The Lost Christmas Eve Twenty One Pilots UFC War Horse We Will Rock You West Side StoryWicked Willie Nelson WWE: Live WWE: SmackDown WWE: Raw Yo Gabba Gabba: Holiday Show Zac Brown Band ZZ Top Baltimore Ravens Buffalo Bills Cincinnati Bengals Cleveland Browns Denver Broncos Houston Texans Indianapolis Colts Jacksonville Jaguars Kansas City Chiefs Miami Dolphins New England Patriots New York Jets Oakland Raiders Pittsburgh Steelers San Diego Chargers Tennessee Titans Arizona Cardinals Atlanta Falcons Carolina Panthers Chicago Bears Dallas_ Cowboys Detroit Lions Green Bay Packers Minnesota Vikings New Orleans Saints New York Giants Philadelphia Eagles San Francisco 49ers Seattle Seahawks St Louis Rams Tampa Bay Buccaneers Washington Redskins Atlanta Hawks Boston Celtics Brooklyn Nets Charlotte Bobcats Chicago Bulls Cleveland Cavaliers Detroit Pistons Indiana Pacers Miami Heat Milwaukee Bucks New York Knicks Orlando Magic Philadelphia 76ers Toronto Raptors Washington Wizards Dallas Mavericks Denver Nuggets Golden State Warriors Houston Rockets Los Angeles Clippers Lakers Memphis Grizzlies Minnesota Timberwolves New Orleans Pelicans Phoenix Suns Portland Trail Blazers Sacramento Kings San Antonio Spurs Oklahoma City Thunder Utah Jazz Boston Bruins Buffalo Sabres Carolina Hurricanes Florida Panthers Montreal Canadiens New Jersey Devils New York Islanders New York Rangers Ottawa Senators Philadelphia Flyers Pittsburgh Penguins Tampa Bay Lightning
Across two continents, in three formats, wearing two different shades of green, the superheroes of South Africa and Pakistan have been locked in an exhausting cricket struggle for what has felt like most of the year. Not since India and Sri Lanka last bored one another senseless have so many cricket followers logged onto ESPNcricinfo, raised their eyebrows and exclaimed, "For the love of all that's holy, not these two AGAIN!" The people who construct the Future Tours Programme clearly think that the internet has shrunk our attention spans to goldfish-like proportions: "Well I thoroughly enjoyed watching South Africa against Pakistan in Dubai. Oh look, there's a picture of a kitten wearing a tie, with an amusing caption. How adorable! What's on tomorrow? I see Pakistan are touring South Africa. That should be a good series." By Wednesday, the score in xxxx was 14-7 to South Africa, but the 22nd in this soap opera was the best yet. Pakistan had scored a healthy, rosy-cheeked 262, but South Africa were racing along nicely like a family of wildebeests who had left a day early to get to the next watering hole and were consequently well ahead of the herd. With the required run rate down to less than a run a ball, Amla and Duminy knew what they had to do. Tap the ball into a gap, stroll and repeat until the thing was won. Yet it was at this point that JP began to show symptoms of Unexpected South African Asphyxiation Syndrome. With 11 to get, he tried to score them all at once with a billionaire's swing at Ajmal. This was a little panicky, and the panic spread through the team like the rumour of an approaching eagle through a meerkat colony. First there was mild panic, as Amla tried but failed to nudge the ball into the off side. Mild panic became moderate panic next ball as he cleared his leg out of the way, had a swing and bunted the ball into the ground. Finally, we witnessed full-blown severe panic as Hashim swiped the ball up into the air like a man who had never nudged a single in his life. "Ah, this ball is going to land safe," said the commentator, which to those of us who could see two players converging underneath it seemed an unnecessarily harsh verdict on Pakistan's fielding standards. Unnecessarily harsh and inaccurate, as it turned out, because the ball didn't land safely, it landed in Hafeez's hands. With only nine runs to play with, you might think the next bowler would be a tad nervous, but Junaid was full of beans as he ran in to bowl the last over, giving a little leap at the start of his run-up, like a newborn lamb enjoying a frolic in the outfield. South Africa on the other hand were utterly bean-less. David Miller offered a wild swing like a golfer who had forgotten mid-stroke how to play golf. Duminy, having failed to hit his previous delivery for 11, decided that a nine was definitely on and holed out. Ryan McLaren came in, but it made no difference. By this stage, big booming boundaries were required, but all he and Miller could manage were feeble singles. They were like unwitting contestants in some dodgy fairground sideshow, where the game is rigged so that no matter how hard you swing, you have no chance of winning a teddy bear. The cameras lingered on spectators covering their faces with their collars, which I presume is the South African way of registering that unique cocktail of ripe disbelief, mild anger and prickly embarrassment that comes with a good old-fashioned choke, and the commentators came over a little Lady Haversham as they tried to convey their surprise. Off the last ball, with South Africa needing a six, Junaid fired the ball past Miller's big toe, past the bat and past the wicketkeeper, and we witnessed the unusual spectacle of fielders celebrating wildly as the ball hurtled to the boundary. So, well done, Misbah. Everyone likes to have a grumble about the old boy, and apparently even the Taliban don't rate him, but he's captained Pakistan to victory in a one-day series against South Africa, and he's the only man on the planet who has. "Well I thoroughly enjoyed watching South Africa against Pakistan in Dubai. Oh look, there's a picture of a kitten wearing a tie, with an amusing caption. How adorable! What's on tomorrow? I see Pakistan are touring South Africa. That should be a good series."The cameras lingered on spectators covering their faces with their collars, which I presume is the South African way of registering that unique cocktail of ripe disbelief, mild anger and prickly embarrassment that comes with a good old-fashioned choke, and the commentators came over a little Lady Haversham as they tried to convey their surprise. "..... even the Taliban don't rate him, but he's captained Pakistan to victory in a one-day series against South Africa, and he's the only man on the planet who has." Miracles still happen.I didn't watch this series after Pakistan's performance in the ODI series in the UAE. the commentator was actually right when he said that the ball would land safe. In Urdu, Hafeez means safe. As I watched Mitchell Johnson rip the English batting to shreds in the recent Test match in Brisbane, I marvelled at his pace and accuracy. It was brilliant bowling backed by aggressive captaincy and sharp fielding. At no point did I feel the English batsmen to be pathetic or gutless - just outplayed by better opposition on that day. My detached appreciation was a contrast to my agonised reaction to India's 4-0 drubbing by England a couple of summers ago. Watching Yuvraj, Raina, Gambhir - really, everyone except Dravid - hop around like epileptic cats on a hot tin roof, I sneered: "Flat-track bullies. Hopeless, the whole lot of them - they all ought to be sacked forthwith." I spent barely a moment appreciating the skills of Broad, Bresnan and Anderson and their relentless pounding of the batsmen, forcing the errors. What is it about watching your own team that pushes you to either extreme of the emotional register - euphoria or deep dudgeon? Why is it that we are able to appreciate the game, the players and the performances, with greater equanimity and objectivity when "our" team is not involved? Can we ever be fair or dispassionate when it comes to our own team, and is that even desirable? These are questions worth pondering - as long as one doesn't expect any definitive answers. Today I'd like to pose a slightly different question: whom do we support when, as the saying goes, we don't have a dog in the fight? I can't speak for everyone, but at least for Indian fans, certain preferences seem to be fairly ingrained. Most Indian cricket fans would, on balance, tend to support the Aussies over England when it comes to the Ashes. Mind you, it's not always easy and we get there with a fair degree of agonising. One has to balance distaste for the relentless aggro of the Australians and their often dubious claims to playing "tough but fair" with admiration for their all-out style, where they go for a victory every time, draws be damned. Their resilience - not until their last batsman has been dismissed or the winning run scored is victory assured for their opponents - is another source of their appeal. England, on the other hand, especially in the era before India's ascent to economic dominance in cricket, often seemed to be both reluctant and stodgy tourists. For some of us England are unfortunately associated with the deadening defence of Chris Tavaré and the whiff of John Lever's Vaseline. Strange as it may sound to many hyper-nationalists, for those of my vintage (who fell in love with the game in the early xxxxs), after India it was always Pakistan we supported. There was such panache to the likes of Majid Khan, Zaheer Abbas and Wasim Raja. But most of all, Pakistan had what India lacked: fast bowlers who could strike fear in the opposition. A favourite pastime was arguing over the composition of a combined India-Pakistan XI. For what it's worth, here is mine from those days: Sunny and Majid opening; Zaheer, Vishy and Javed in the middle order; Imran and Kapil; Kirmani keeping; Abdul Qadir and Bishan Bedi as spinners; and Sarfraz Nawaz completing the attack. With two of the greatest allrounders in it, this team could have held its own against any World XI - provided they could agree on who out of that array of prima donnas was going to be captain. Until recently, another fairly safe prediction would have been that Indians would mostly back West Indies against all comers outside of the subcontinental teams. The sheer exuberance of Caribbean cricket - as embodied by the likes of Lloyd, Richards, Kallicharran and Fredericks in previous years, and Lara, Richardson and Sarwan in more recent times - made them immensely likeable. Of course West Indies have now declined precipitously, making it harder to rally behind them, except in the way that one supports the underdog. Which is not really support so much as sympathy. (You know things have changed a lot for West Indies when their fast bowler has the surname Rampaul while their lead spinner's surname is Shillingford - and not Ali or Narine or some such name of Indian extraction!) My India-Pakistan XI would be: Sunny and Majid opening; Zaheer, Vishy and Javed in the middle order; Imran and Kapil; Kirmani keeping; Abdul Qadir and Bishan Bedi as spinners; and Sarfraz Nawaz completing the attack You can't help supporting New Zealand against whoever they play. Their population is about the same as Chennai's, and their cricketers get to play about half a dozen first-class matches every year before taking on others in Test matches. And a lot of their best sporting talent is lost to rugby. To me it is amazing that New Zealand can produce the likes of Richard Hadlee, Glenn Turner, Chris Cairns and Martin Crowe out of their domestic set-up. When Bevan Congdon made those two huge centuries (176 and 175 in successive Tests in England in the summer of xxxx) you thought to yourself: "Wow, now there's a captain for you." At the risk of romanticising current realities, one could say New Zealand are the last amateurs in a world that has been disenchanted by professionalism, and often worthy of support just for that. For similar reasons, I've always had a soft corner for the Sri Lankans. The annual Gopalan Trophy matches that pitted them against Tamil Nadu gave a glimpse of cricketers who looked like Indians but played more like the Caribbeans. Dashers like Duleep Mendis and Roy Dias, and classicists like Anura Tennekoon and David Heyn, made lifelong fans of many of us across the straits. Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara are worthy heirs to a great tradition of classy batting. Post-apartheid South Africa have a lot going for them. I suspect for many Indian fans they are the preferred team when they play England or Australia. Players like Steyn, Kallis, AB de Villiers, and especially Hashim Amla, seem like wonderful throwbacks to an era in which players let their game do the talking. Terrific fast bowling alongside the best fielding is bound to win you a lot of fans in India. It's hard for Indian fans to develop any allegiance or antipathy towards Bangladesh and Zimbabwe at this point - more players with the charisma of a Tamim Iqbal are desperately needed for us to care one way or the other. In summary, then, for the average Indian fan I would hazard that our preference ordering in match-ups not involving India goes something like this: Subcontinent (defined as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and sometimes Bangladesh) > New Zealand > West Indies > South Africa > Australia > England. While this is probably true on the whole for most of us, a particular series may be viewed differently depending on a bunch of contextual variables. Nor does this prevent us from liking a particular player even if we aren't particularly enamoured of his team or nationality. Unfortunately all this adds weight to Mike Marqusee's claim back in the early xxxxs that for a lot of cricket fans it's "anyone but England". Beyond the match-ups and our preferences within them, the larger point is that watching as neutrals allows us to appreciate the beauty of the game, its ebbs and flows, and the skills of its practitioners - which our passionate partisanship often blind us to. Sometimes caring less means enjoying more. Zippergate, ball-tampering, whatever the crime, it doesn't explain Pakistan won the toss. It was a straightforward task to close out the Test series, wasn't it? It's what the coach expected. Dale Steyn struggled to be fit for the match. Imran Tahir had struggled to take any international wickets. Advantage Pakistan? Seemingly so, but that first innings of the match became a disaster; so great a failure that Dav Whatmore the performance of his batsmen in the middle of the Test. Now Pakistan have crumbled with victory imminent in the The basics of shot selection, playing straight, and managing a simple run chase evaporated into the Sharjah night. I can't remember a time since the xxxxs, when Pakistan were weakened by Kerry Packer, that the batsmen have seemed so vulnerable. It isn't even Pakistan's habitual crime of being unpredictable. A depressing inevitability surrounds the batting performances, so much so that the achievements of the first Test were an utter surprise, albeit a pleasant one. The prime responsibility lies with the top order, we know, where oss of form adds to the dilemma of the openers.But the top-order issue cannot alone explain Pakistan's woes. The middle order lacks depth. The main wicketkeepers are some of the weakest at batting in international cricket. Let's not start on their keeping. A nation of allrounders has exhausted its pipeline. The lower order barely know which end of a bat to hold. Only the captain, is able to bat with any consistency. But for Misbah and the skills of the country's bowlers, Pakistan would be at the bottom of every pile. One particular weakness is batting first in an international match. How often do Pakistan dominate a Test match from the first innings, particularly when they bat first? Batting first in a Test match is an opportunity to seize the initiative. The better teams expect to post big totals and apply pressure. But Pakistan rarely do. Yes, Pakistan's defeat in Sharjah came from a run chase, but let's take this measure of how a team performs in the first innings of an international match as a proxy for the ability of its batsmen.To investigate, I looked up a illuminating statistic. Since the damaging England tour of xxxx, Pakistan's average score when batting first in a Test match is 261. To put that into perspective, South Africa's average score when batting first during the same period is 382, the best of any Test team. Indeed, Pakistan's record is the Even Bangladesh and Zimbabwe are better. Misbah's response has been to dig in, to fight and grind out a rearguard. But there is only so much one man can do Pakistan's record in one-day internationals in this period is When batting first since that England series in xxxx, Pakistan average 223. South Africa, by contrast, average 268, which is the best, above India with 265. Pakistan do better than Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, but that's it. Using this statistic as a measure of batting performance, Pakistan have declined sharply since xxxx, both in Test matches and one-day internationals, when compared with their own performances before xxxx and against other countries since xxxx. What this means is that Pakistan's whole batting order is failing to respond to the challenge of batting first in an international match. When the top order lets the team down, as it usually does, the middle order struggles to take the initiative, and the tailenders do little to defy their opponents. In general, teams that score heavily in the first innings of an international match tend to be more successful. These failings in the first innings, when batting conditions are traditionally at their best, are destroying the confidence of Pakistan's batsmen, so much so that a hospitable track becomes a minefield, a friendly attack becomes endowed with devilment, and an easy run chase becomes impossible. The solutions for Pakistan aren't obvious. The alternatives are unready, thanks, as Misbah-ul-Haq rightly points out, to an inadequate domestic circuit. The four young openers across both formats will require time to establish themselves. At No. 3, it's clear that Azhar Ali should be rested from Test cricket, but it's less clear who can replace him. Perhaps Asad Shafiq can step up in both formats? Even if that solves one problem, Pakistan still seek depth in their middle order, wicketkeepers who can bat, a bowling allrounder, and generally more tenacity from their lower-order batsmen. But both Test and one-day squads struggle for opportunities and fixtures to allow replacements to be tested and establish themselves. Misbah's response has been to dig in, to fight and grind out a rearguard. But there is only so much one man can do. He needs help. Given the failings of domestic cricket, Pakistan should consider bucking the trend in international selection of choosing different squads for different formats. Why not select essentially the same core squad of players for Test and one-day international cricket? An international cricketer of sufficient class will be able to succeed in both formats. "A" tours and T20 cricket can be then used to blood new talent. Selecting different squads for different formats is just a fashion. There is no evidence to support it. Pakistan, in the current circumstances, don't have the luxury of being fashionable. Pragmatism is required. The deterioration in Pakistan's batting won't be fixed by doing what's being done now and simply trying harder. The chosen few require as much international exposure as is available.
• Location: Everett
• Post ID: xxxxxxxx everett
• Other ads by this user:
Seattle Mariners xxxx Season MLB Tickets - All Home & Away Games (MLB Baseball xxxx Season Tickets) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Seattle Mariners xxxx Season MLB Tickets - All Home & Away Games (MLB Baseball xxxx Season Tickets) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Seattle Mariners xxxx Season MLB Tickets - All Home & Away Games (MLB Baseball xxxx Season Tickets) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Seattle Seahawks xxxx xxxx Games Football Tickets Info - Home & Away (Best Source of Football Tixs - All Games) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
All Games - Seattle Mariners Tickets in Peoria, AZ buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
//
//]]>
Email this ad
Play it safe. Avoid Scammers.
Most of the time, transactions outside of your local area involving money orders, cashier checks, wire transfers or shipping (especially overseas shipping) are scams or frauds.
Report all scam attempts to abuse@backpage.com.